Menganalisis Relasi Edukasi, Misinformasi, Persepsi Risiko Dan Keterlibatan Publik Dalam Komunikasi Perubahan Iklim Di Media Sosial Melaluitinjauan Literatur

Authors

  • Yonathan Suryo Pambudi Universitas Kristen Teknologi Solo
  • Cicik Sudaryantiningsih Universitas Kristen Teknologi Solo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.822

Keywords:

Perubahan Iklim, Media Sosial, Edukasi Iklim, Misinformasi, Keterlibatan Publik

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis relasi antara edukasi, misinformasi, persepsi risiko, dan keterlibatan publik dalam komunikasi perubahan iklim di media sosial. Fokus penelitian diarahkan untuk memahami bagaimana media sosial membentuk pengetahuan publik, bagaimana misinformasi iklim berkembang, serta bagaimana kedua aspek tersebut berhubungan dengan persepsi risiko dan partisipasi publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode tinjauan literatur kualitatif dengan pendekatan sintesis tematik integratif. Data diperoleh dari 35 artikel jurnal bereputasi terindeks Scopus quartile 1 dan 2 yang relevan dengan komunikasi perubahan iklim di media sosial. Artikel dianalisis melalui proses seleksi, ekstraksi data, pengodean tema, dan sintesis berdasarkan tiga rumusan masalah penelitian.

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa media sosial berperan sebagai ruang edukasi perubahan iklim melalui video, narasi visual, influencer, komentar, meme, tagar, dan konten interaktif. Namun, media sosial juga menjadi ruang penyebaran misinformasi, disinformasi, climate denialism, climate delayism, obstructionism, dan penyangkalan solusi iklim. Temuan juga menunjukkan bahwa persepsi risiko publik dibentuk oleh pengetahuan, nilai, emosi, pengalaman lokal, visualisasi, kredibilitas sumber, dan struktur platform. Keterlibatan publik muncul dalam bentuk komentar, berbagi konten, diskusi, aktivisme, humor, sarkasme, dan polarisasi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa edukasi, misinformasi, persepsi risiko, dan keterlibatan publik saling terkait dalam ekosistem komunikasi digital. Kajian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan studi komunikasi lingkungan, komunikasi risiko, komunikasi sains, literasi media, dan studi media digital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aharonson, V., Christodoulou, V., Karpasitis, C., Joselowitz, J., Nowaczyk, S., Lazebnik, T., & Iordanou, K. (2026). Audience engagement with climate change content on YouTube: An analysis of video attributes and user interactions. Frontiers in Climate, 8, 1803829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1803829

Al-Rawi, A., O’Keefe, D., Kane, O., & Bizimana, A.-J. (2021). Twitter’s fake news discourses around climate change and global warming. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 729818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.729818

Boulianne, S., Lalancette, M., & Ilkiw, D. (2020). School Strike 4 Climate: Social media and the international youth protest on climate change. Media and Communication, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2768

Cann, T. J. B., Weaver, I. S., & Williams, H. T. P. (2021). Ideological biases in social sharing of online information about climate change. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0250656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250656

Duran-Becerra, B., Hillyer, G. C., Cosgrove, A., & Basch, C. H. (2020). Climate change on YouTube: A potential platform for youth learning. Health Promotion Perspectives, 10(3), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2020.42

Effrosynidis, D., Sylaios, G., & Arampatzis, A. (2022). Exploring climate change on Twitter using seven aspects: Stance, sentiment, aggressiveness, temperature, gender, topics, and disasters. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0274213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274213

Elgammal, N. (2025). Analyzing YouTube users’ comments on climate change issues presented through immersive mixed reality using sentiment analysis and network analysis tools. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1657059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1657059

Eslen-Ziya, H. (2022). Humour and sarcasm: Expressions of global warming on Twitter. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 240. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01236-y

Essien, E. O. (2025). Climate change disinformation on social media: A meta-synthesis on epistemic welfare in the post-truth era. Social Sciences, 14(5), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050304

Fage-Butler, A. (2022). A values-based approach to knowledge in the public’s representations of climate change on social media. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 978670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.978670

Gokcimen, T., & Das, B. (2024). Exploring climate change discourse on social media and blogs using a topic modeling analysis. Heliyon, 10(11), e32464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32464

Hautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B., & Zeng, J. (2021). Showing they care (or don’t): Affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344

Javed, M. N., Adnan, H. M., Hanan, M. A., Sarmiti, N. Z., Adeeb, H., Khan, A., & Iftikhar, A. (2023). Social media reporting on agricultural adaptation to climate change in Pakistan: Measures and implications for sustainability. Heliyon, 9(11), e21579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21579

Johann, M., Höhnle, L., & Dombrowski, J. (2023). Fridays for Future and Mondays for Memes: How climate crisis memes mobilize social media users. Media and Communication, 11(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6658

Kaul, L., Schrögel, P., & Humm, C. (2020). Environmental science communication for a young audience: A case study on the #EarthOvershootDay campaign on YouTube. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 601177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.601177

Lima, R. O., Belém, A., Lycarião, D., Oliveira, T., Evangelista, S., Massarani, L., & Alves, M. (2024). (Un)certainty in science and climate change: A longitudinal analysis (2014–2022) of narratives about climate science on social media in Brazil (Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter). Journal of Science Communication, 23(09), A07. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23090207

Liu, J. C.-E., & Lee, C.-F. (2025). Climate and energy misinformation in Taiwan. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1531126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1531126

Luebke, S. M., Ozornina, N., Haim, M., & Haßler, J. (2025). Climate communication in the hybrid media system: Media and stakeholder logics on social media. Media and Communication, 13, Article 9892. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9892

Meyer, H., Peach, A. K., Guenther, L., Kedar, H. E., & Brüggemann, M. (2023). Between calls for action and narratives of denial: Climate change attention structures on Twitter. Media and Communication, 11(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111

Moreno-Cabanillas, A., Castillero-Ostio, E., & Serna-Ortega, Á. (2024). Digital disinformation strategies of European climate change obstructionist think tanks. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1470343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1470343

Nicolosi, E., Medina, R., Brewer, S., Vorkink, M., & Allred, A. (2025). The new denial: Climate solution misinformation on social media. Global Sustainability, 8, e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10016

Pavelle, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2020). Into the digital wild: Utilizing Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook for effective science and environmental communication. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 575122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122

Rabe, C., & Paz, A. (2025). More than just facts: Countering climate mis-and-disinformation with critical thinking and empathy. PLOS Climate, 4(10), e0000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000737

Refaat Moharam, M. M., & Shehata, A. M. K. (2026). Dependence on social media for climate change information and its effects: A survey study on a sample of Omanis. Frontiers in Communication, 11, 1709682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1709682

Rice, J. K. (2026). Beyond post-truth: Projecting the future trajectory of climate misinformation. PLOS Climate, 5(5), e0000916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000916

Rojas, C., Algra-Maschio, F., Andrejevic, M., Coan, T., Cook, J., & Li, Y.-F. (2024). Hierarchical machine learning models can identify stimuli of climate change misinformation on social media. Communications Earth & Environment, 5, 436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01573-7

Segerberg, A., & Magnani, M. (2025). Visual digital intermediaries and global climate communication: Is climate change still a distant problem on YouTube? PLOS ONE, 20(4), e0318338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318338

Singh, M. K. (2025). Men deny more than they believe about climate change on Twitter (X). PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0303007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303007

Storani, S., Falkenberg, M., Quattrociocchi, W., & Cinelli, M. (2025). Relative engagement with sources of climate misinformation is growing across social media platforms. Scientific Reports, 15, 18629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03082-9

Sultana, B. C., Prodhan, M. T. R., Alam, E., Sohel, M. S., Bari, A. B. M. M., Pal, S. C., Islam, M. K., & Islam, A. R. M. T. (2024). A systematic review of the nexus between climate change and social media: Present status, trends, and future challenges. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1301400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1301400

Tuitjer, L., & Dirksmeier, P. (2021). Social media and perceived climate change efficacy: A European comparison. Digital Geography and Society, 2, 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100018

Vidal, D. G. (2026). When algorithms decide the climate: AI, disinformation, and the crisis of environmental truth in the Anthropocene. PLOS Climate, 5(1), e0000799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000799

Weitkamp, E., Milani, E., Ridgway, A., & Wilkinson, C. (2021). Exploring the digital media ecology: Insights from a study of healthy diets and climate change communication on digital and social media. Journal of Science Communication, 20(03), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030202

Zanartu, F., Cook, J., Wagner, M., & García, J. (2024). A technocognitive approach to detecting fallacies in climate misinformation. Scientific Reports, 14, 27647. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76139-w

Zhang, K., Qu, B., & Huang, Q. (2026). Negotiating climate change: Science, policy, and the invisible power embedded in public discourse in Chinese social media. PLOS ONE, 21(5), e0348708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348708

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Pambudi, Y. S., & Sudaryantiningsih, C. (2026). Menganalisis Relasi Edukasi, Misinformasi, Persepsi Risiko Dan Keterlibatan Publik Dalam Komunikasi Perubahan Iklim Di Media Sosial Melaluitinjauan Literatur. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 4(2), 3166–3179. https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.822