Mengkritisi Paradigma Konvensional Corporate Governance: Studi Kasus PT Paragon Technology And Innovation Dalam Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Yang Etis Dan Berkelanjutan

Muhammad Aqil Sirojuddin; Ahmad Hanif Setiawan; Rameyza Elya Ibnaty; Noor Imamah Jayanti Taufiqs; Geoffrey Cliff Hartono; Rifki Aditya Wicaksono; Rohmawati Kusumaningtias; Ambar Kusumaningsih

doi:10.69693/ijim.v4i2.665

Authors

Muhammad Aqil Sirojuddin Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Ahmad Hanif Setiawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Rameyza Elya Ibnaty Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Noor Imamah Jayanti Taufiqs Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Geoffrey Cliff Hartono Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Rifki Aditya Wicaksono Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Rohmawati Kusumaningtias Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Ambar Kusumaningsih Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.665

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Teori Agensi, Stakeholder Theory, Etika Bisnis, Sustainability

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkritisi paradigma konvensional corporate governance yang didominasi oleh teori agensi, serta menganalisis bagaimana praktik tata kelola yang lebih etis dan berkelanjutan dapat diwujudkan melalui studi kasus PT Paragon Technology and Innovation. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus deskriptif-analitis. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumentasi terhadap laporan tahunan, laporan keberlanjutan, profil perusahaan, serta literatur terkait teori agensi, stakeholder theory, etika bisnis, dan konsep common good. Teknik analisis data dilakukan melalui analisis tematik yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa paradigma corporate governance berbasis teori agensi memiliki keterbatasan karena terlalu menekankan kepentingan pemegang saham dan mekanisme kontrol. Sebaliknya, praktik tata kelola yang diterapkan oleh PT Paragon Technology and Innovation menunjukkan pendekatan yang lebih humanistik melalui penerapan nilai etika, kepemimpinan berbasis nilai, tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan, serta komitmen terhadap keberlanjutan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa telah terjadi pergeseran paradigma corporate governance dari pendekatan yang berorientasi shareholder menuju pendekatan yang lebih inklusif, etis, dan berkelanjutan berbasis stakeholder dan prinsip ESG.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abudu, D. & Salman, S.A. 2025. Corporate governance and Shareholders ’ Value : The Mediating Role of Internal Audit Performance — Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Ghana.

Aguilera, R. V & Castillo, M.R. 2025. Toward an updated corporate governance framework : Fundamentals , disruptions , and future research.

Al-faryan, M.A.S. 2024. Agency theory , corporate governance and corruption : an integrative literature review approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). Tersedia di https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893.

Alifah, R., Berliana, V., & Furrie, W. (2024). Analysis of PT Paragon Innovation and Technology Corporate Social Responsibility Assistance Program for Palestine Analisis Program Corporate Social Responsibility Bantuan PT Paragon Innovation and Technology untuk Palestina. 3(1), 223–228.

Alternatif, K. (2024). Teori Corporate governance : 8(2), 1568–1574. https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i2.1997

Anifowose, M. 2025. Evidence of the impact of corporate governance on ESG disclosure in sub - Saharan Africa : the moderating role of ownership structure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, (0123456789). Tersedia di https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-025-00294-3.

Awa, H.O., Etim, W. & Ogbonda, E. 2024. Stakeholders , stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility ( CSR ). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. Tersedia di https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y.

Buchetti, B., Romana, F. & Perdichizzi, S. 2025. International Review of Financial Analysis A literature review on corporate governance and ESG research : Emerging trends and future directions ☆. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97(November 2024): 103759. Tersedia di https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103759.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dinda, T., Dewi, K. & Ongkowijoyo, G. 2025. The interplay of CSR , ethical leadership , and corporate governance on I ndonesia ’ s construction material firm performance. 24(2): 239–258.

Dwi, F. & Sofalina, J. 2025. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE , RISK MANAGEMENT , AND BUSINESS ETHICS ON FIRM PERFORMANCE IN THE MODERN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT. (2): 4721–4734.

Ilmiah, J., Dan, E., Batubara, R. L., Jl, A., No, I., Tim, K. M., Medan, K., & Utara, S. (2026). KAJIAN KUALITATIF TEORI-TEORI GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN Putri Wahyuni Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara Afni Haryanti Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara Ahmad Wahyudi Zein. 4(1), 622–627.

Indonesia, U. I., & Ishak, A. R. (2025). PENGARUH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PT PARAGON TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION DC YOGYAKARTA TERHADAP FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI DAN ILMU SOSIAL BUDAYA Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility PT Paragon Technology and Innovation DC Yogyakarta Terhadap Citra Perus.

Jamilah, S. (n.d.). PT Paragon Technology And Innovation : Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Society 5 . 0 Studi Kasus Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.

Kautsar, B., Salman, R., Djunaedi, A.Z. & Ardianto, H. 2024. Exploring Environmental , Social , and Governance Practices from the Perspective of Agency Theory and Stakeholders Theory. 20–30.

Khatri, I., Einar, P., Kalliainen, A. & Kjærland, F. 2025. International Review of Financial Analysis Corporate governance mechanisms and non-financial disclosure quality : Evidence from sustainability committee , external CSR assurance , and stakeholder engagement. 107(September).

Kumalasari, K. P., & Sudarma, M. (2013). A Critical Perspective towards Agency Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 4. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2013.08.7197

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nabila, I., & Idzatulloh, A. (2025). Peran Corporate Communication PT Paragon Technology And Innovation Dalam Mempertahankan Citra Positif Perusahaan. 2, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i1.621

Sulemana, I., Cheng, L., Osei, A., Osei, A. & Masuni, T. 2025. Stakeholders and sustainability disclosure : Evidence from an emerging market. Sustainable Futures, 9(November 2024): 100445. Tersedia di https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100445.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Trisnaningsih, S. 2024. Application Of Business Ethics and Good Corporate governance To Company Financial Performance. 2(3): 244–254.

Yavuz, A.E., Kocaman, B.E. & Do, M. 2024. The Impact of Corporate governance on Sustainability Disclosures : A Comparison from the Perspective of Financial and Non-Financial Firms.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.