The Role of Financing Risk in Moderating the Relationship between Bank Size and Health in Islamic Commercial Banks for the Period 2021-2023

Authors

  • Rena Soraya Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Akhmadi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Eka Purwanda Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v3i1.290

Keywords:

Bank Health, Size, Financing Risk, Operational Efficiency

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore and examine the nature of the ability of Islamic Commercial Banks to stabilize the level of bank health as proxied by the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) by considering the value of bank size, which in this case is studied in more depth by using financing risk as a moderating variable and operations efficiency as a control variable in Islamic Commercial Banks for the period 2021-2023. This study uses secondary data from quarterly financial reports published by each Islamic Commercial Bank with a sample size of 10 Islamic Commercial Banks. A sampling technique using purposive sampling was used. The data analysis used is panel data regression using the Random Effect Model (REM). The data analysis technique used is the Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) panel data test. The results of this study indicate that Size has a significant negative effect partially on Bank Health (CAR). Financing Risk moderates the impact of Size on CAR. The interaction of financing risk (NPF) with Size moderates the effect of Size on bank health (CAR). The results show this study's role of financing risk as a quasi-moderation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acikalin, S., Bakin, B., & Celik, G. (2015). The Determinants of Banks ’ Capital Adequacy Ratio : Some Evidence from South Eastern European Countries. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(1), 79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v7i1(J).565

Alraheb, T. H., Nicolas, C., & Tarazi, A. (2019). Institutional environment and bank capital ratios. Journal of Financial Stability, 43, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2019.05.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2019.05.016

Barua, R. (2018). Capital Adequacy of Indian Commercial Banks under Basel Regime - An Empirical Study. Prajnan, 47(3), 283–306. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=134548791&site=eds-live

Ben Salah Mahdi, I., & Boujelbene Abbes, M. (2018). Relationship between capital, risk and liquidity: a comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks in MENA region. Research in International Business and Finance, 45(February), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.113

Bremus, F., & Ludolph, M. (2021). The nexus between loan portfolio size and volatility: Does bank capital regulation matter? Journal of Banking and Finance, 127, 106122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106122

Bukian, N. M. W. P., & Sudiartha, G. M. (2016). EFISIENSI OPERASIONAL TERHADAP RASIO KECUKUPAN MODAL Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana ( Unud ), Bali , Indonesia Perbankan merupakan suatu lembaga yang mengemban fungsi utama sebagai perantara keuangan antara pihak-pihak yang memiliki dana. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 5(2), 1189–1220.

Chen, C. (2018). What drives purchase intention on Airbnb? Perspectives of consumer reviews, information quality, and media richness. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1512–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.019

Djuwita, D., & Muhammad, A. F. (2016). Pengaruh Total DPK, FDR, NPF dan ROA terhadap Total Asset Bank Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syari’ah, 8(1), 281–297.

Etudaiye-Muhtar, O. F., & Abdul-Baki, Z. (2021). Market structure, institutional quality and bank capital ratios: evidence from developing countries. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 30(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-09-2019-0158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-09-2019-0158

Firdiyanti, S. I., Muchlis, M., & Afendi, A. (2021). Determinasi Total Aset Unit Usaha Syariah di Indonesia Tahun 2014-2019. Business Management Journal, 17(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.30813/bmj.v17i2.2427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30813/bmj.v17i2.2427

Gujarati, D. (1999). Ekonometrika Dasar. Airlangga.

Hadjixenophontos, A., & Christodoulou-Volos, C. (2018). Financial Crisis and Capital Adequacy Ratio: A Case Study for Cypriot Commercial Banks. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 8(3), 1792–6599.

Hamidah, Mahdiyyah, R. H., & Mardiyati, U. (2021). “Pengaruh Npl, Nim, Bopo, Ldr, Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Capital Adequacy Ratio (Car) Pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Di Indonesia Periode 2014 – 2018.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 12(1), 169–190.

Harkati, R., Alhabshi, S. M., & Kassim, S. (2020). Does capital adequacy ratio influence risk-taking behaviour of conventional and Islamic banks differently? Empirical evidence from dual banking system of Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(9), 1989–2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2019-0212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2019-0212

Hisan, U. F. C., & Septiarini, D. F. (2020). Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental Dan Variabel Makroekonomi Terhadap Capital Buffer Bank Syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 7(2), 356. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20202pp356-371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20202pp356-371

J. Marcus, A. (1984). teori 2. Journal Of Banking and Finance, 8, 557–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(84)80046-1

Jiang, H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Bank capital buffer, franchise value, and risk heterogeneity in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1455–1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.084

Kablay, H., & Gumbo, V. (2021). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio of Banks in Botswana. Journal of Mathematics Research, 13(6), 38. https://doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v13n6p38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v13n6p38

Kharouf, H., Lund, D. J., Krallman, A., & Pullig, C. (2020). A signaling theory approach to relationship recovery. European Journal of Marketing, 54(9), 2139–2170. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2019-0751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2019-0751

Kurnianingsih, D. E., Hermawan, D., & Mayasari, I. (2021). Analisis Determinan Capital Buffer pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Periode 2015-2020. Journal of Applied Islamic Economics and Finance, 2(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.35313/jaief.v2i1.2965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35313/jaief.v2i1.2965

Linh, D. H., Dung, T. M., Hang, L. T. T., & Mai, D. N. (2018). Determinants of Islamic Banks Liquidity and Lessons for Vietnam Banks. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 17(5), 13–23.

Maji, S. G., & Hazarika, P. (2018). Capital regulation, competition and risk taking behaviour of Indian banks in a simultaneous approach. Managerial Finance. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2017-0340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2017-0340

Mustafa, A., & Mumtaz, M. Z. (2022). Examining the Bank-Specific and Macro-Economic Factors that Influence Capital Adequacy in Pakistan. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 12(2), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v12i2.221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v12i2.221

Nanda Arum Fauzia, I. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Capital Buffer (Studi Kasus pada Bank Umum Konvensional yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2011-2014). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 5(2), 1–12.

Nurhikmah, F., & Farah Wulandari Pangestuty. (2020). Determinants of Banking Capital Buffer in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 8(1), 13–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2020.008.01.3

Obeid, R. (2023). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio in the Banking Sector: Evidence from the Arab Region. International Journal of Business and Management, 18(5), 63. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v18n5p63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v18n5p63

Oktaviana, R., & Syaichu, M. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Size , ROA , FDR , NPF DAN BOPO Terhadap Capital Adequacy Ratio Pada Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2010-2014. Diponegoro Journal of Management, 5(4), 1–10.

Perdana, D. (2022). Likuiditas, Profitabilitas dan Kecukupan Modal Bank Di Indonesia. Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 25(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v25i2.743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v25i2.743

Posnaya, E. A., Dobrolezha, E. V., Vorobyova, I. G., & Chubarova, G. P. (2018). The economic capital model in bank’s capital assessment. Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, 100, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920180000100013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920180000100013

Septiano, R., & Pratama, S. (2022). Determinasi ROA Dan BOPO Terhadap Kecukupan Modal Pada Bank Nagari Tahun 2016-2018. Jurnal Pundi, 06(01), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.31575/jp.v6i1.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31575/jp.v6i1.381

Siagian, S. (2020). Pengaruh Pengucuran Kredit dan Kredit Bermasalah Terhadap Rasio Kecukupan Modal (CAR) pada Perbankan Nasional. Jurnal Perspektif, 18(2), 193–200.

Sudiyatno, B., Puspitasari, E., Susilowati, Y., Sudarsi, S., & Udin, U. (2019). Determinants of capital adequacy ratio: An empirical study on the conventional banks in indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(7), 115–127.

Susy Muchtar, A. S. (2021). Factor Affecting the Capital Adequacy Ratio of Banks Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Jurnal Ekonomi, 26(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v26i1.733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v26i1.733

Talumantak, R. (2021). Determinant of Capital Adequacy Requirements : The Role of Bank- Specific Factors in Banks Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange. 12(1), 44–51.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Soraya, R., Akhmadi, A., & Purwanda, E. (2025). The Role of Financing Risk in Moderating the Relationship between Bank Size and Health in Islamic Commercial Banks for the Period 2021-2023 . Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 3(1), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v3i1.290