Politeness Strategies and Power Relations in Indonesian Lecturer–Student Classroom Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i3.2630Keywords:
Politeness Strategies, Power Relations, Classroom Discourse, Brown And Levinson, Face-Threatening ActsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the politeness strategies employed by lecturers and students in classroom interaction and to examine how these strategies reflect and negotiate power relations in the context of Indonesian higher education. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach using a Pragmatic Classroom Discourse Analysis framework and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory, which distinguishes four main strategies: Bald On Record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, and Off Record. The data consist of utterances produced during classroom interactions between one lecturer and twenty-five students in an Advanced Linguistics course at an Indonesian university. The data were collected from three classroom sessions, comprising approximately 180 minutes of audio-video recordings that were transcribed verbatim. The analysis involved four stages: segmentation of utterances, identification of Face-Threatening Acts (FTAs), classification of politeness strategies, and interpretation based on power, social distance, and rank of imposition. The findings reveal an asymmetrical pattern in the use of politeness strategies between the lecturer and students. The lecturer predominantly employed Positive Politeness (43%) and Bald On Record (30%), whereas students showed a stronger preference for Negative Politeness (60%). The lecturer’s use of Positive Politeness indicates an effort to establish solidarity and reduce social distance with students, while the use of Bald On Record reflects the need to maintain clarity and institutional authority in classroom management. In contrast, students’ preference for Negative Politeness demonstrates their tendency to minimize face threats and maintain respect when communicating with the lecturer. These findings indicate that politeness in classroom discourse functions not merely as interpersonal courtesy but also as a pragmatic resource for maintaining, negotiating, and managing power relations. The findings further suggest that politeness practices are shaped by Indonesian cultural norms, particularly sungkan and collectivist values, which emphasize respect toward authority and interpersonal harmony.
Downloads
References
Adhari, S., Yendra, & Sesmiyanti. (2022). Positive Politeness Strategies in Classroom Interaction at EFL Class. Journal of Language, Literature, and English Teaching (JULIET), 3(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.31629/juliet.v3i2.4172
Anugrawati, N., & Syam, U. K. (2024). Politeness Strategies in Selected Academic Settings: Insights from Lecturer-Student Interactions in Eastern Indonesia. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 6(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v6i3.20409
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Febriansyah, R., Munir, A., Anam, S., & Setiawan, S. (2021). The Power of Politeness Strategies in EFL Student–Teacher Interaction: Teacher’s Gender Perspective. Indonesian Journal of English Teaching, 10(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2021.10.2.125-135
Fajar, M., & Nadhillah, F. (2023). Revealing Power Relations in Online Learning: A Critical Classroom Discourse Analysis. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 8(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v8i1.18422
Fitriyani, S., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Teacher and Students’ Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom Interactions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.473
Mahmud, M. (2019). The Use of Politeness Strategies in the Classroom Context by English University Students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258
Mantra, I. B. N., Handayani, N. D., & Kumara, D. G. A. G. (2022). Language Politeness Strategies Employed by Lecturers and Students in Online Learning. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 9(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v9i2.27069
Nugrahanto, A. D., & Hartono, R. (2020). Politeness Strategies in Lecturer–Students Classroom Interaction at the Biology Class Sanata Dharma University. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.148
Nuramdani, H. (2023). The Use of Politeness Strategies in Online Teacher-Students’ Virtual Classroom Interaction. English Education Journal, 13(2), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v13i2.73834
Rahayuningsih, D., Saleh, M., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). The Realization of Politeness Strategies in EFL Teacher-Students Classroom Interaction. English Education Journal, 10(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v10i1.33822
Senowarsito. (2013). Politeness Strategies in Teacher-Student Interaction in an EFL Classroom Context. TEFLIN Journal, 24(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v24i1/82-96
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198239727.001.0001
Sülü, A. (2015). Teacher’s Politeness in EFL Class. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 2(4), 216–221. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/76/115
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















