The Influence of Teamwork and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction as a Mediator

Albi Muhammad Fadillah Albi; Puji Rahayu Suci; Alfiana Alfiana

doi:10.69693/ijim.v4i4.2368

Authors

Albi Muhammad Fadillah Albi Universitas Widya Gama Malang
Puji Rahayu Suci Universitas Widya Gama Malang
Alfiana Alfiana Universitas Widya Gama Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i4.2368

Keywords:

Teamwork, Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Employee Performance, PLS-SEM

Abstract

This study examines the influence of Teamwork and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance, both directly and through Job Satisfaction as a mediating variable, among employees of the Motor Vehicle Testing Technical Implementation Unit (UPT PKB) of Arjowinangun and Karanglo, Malang Raya. The phenomenon underlying this study is the steady rise in vehicles undergoing periodic testing after the testing levy was eliminated, which has increased workload without a proportional increase in staff. This study uses a quantitative approach with an explanatory design. All 63 employees of both units were surveyed through saturated sampling using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire, and the data were analyzed with Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 4. Results show that Teamwork and Organizational Commitment both positively and significantly affect Job Satisfaction, and that Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction both positively and significantly affect Employee Performance, whereas Teamwork has no significant direct effect on Employee Performance. Mediation testing shows that Job Satisfaction does not mediate the effect of Teamwork on Employee Performance but partially mediates the effect of Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance. These findings indicate that organizational commitment, reinforced by job satisfaction, is the more consistent driver of performance in this public-service context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustianingsih, F., & Ekowati, V. M. (2024). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Employee Performance.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.

Amin, M. S. (2022). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Analisis regresi linier berganda.

Batubara, R. H., & Mesra, B. (2023). The influence of teamwork on employee performance with the work environment as an intervening variable at the BPJS Employment Office, South Sumatra. SEM-PLS (SmartPLS 3).

Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Halimah, Darka, & Saputra, A. (2024). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. SEM-PLS.

Hardianto, Nursaid, & Martini, N. N. P. G. (2025). The effect of organizational justice on employee performance with work ethic as an intervening variable. SEM-PLS (WarpPLS 7.0).

Harahap, M. F. R., & Siska, E. (2025). Pengaruh Kerja Sama Tim dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan pada PT. Tracon Industri. Regresi linier berganda (SPSS).

Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.

Iryadana, M. R., et al. (2024). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. SEM-PLS.

Nelson, A., & Panjaitan, V. D. M. M. (2023). Quality of Work Life dan Kinerja Karyawan. SEM-PLS.

Ningrum, A. A. P., et al. (2024). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Organizational Commitment dan Employee Performance. SEM-PLS.

Omar, M. S., et al. (2020). Quality of work life and employee performance. SEM-PLS.

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Hubungan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah.

Riskiyani, A., & Ratnawati, A. (2025). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Mediasi. SEM-PLS (SmartPLS).

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.

Santosa, H., et al. (2022). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Organizational Commitment dan Employee Performance. SEM-PLS.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sitepu, D. S., & Indrawan, M. I. (2024). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Kinerja Karyawan melalui Organizational Citizenship Behavior. SEM-PLS.

Sopali, M. F., & Azizi, P. (2025). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life terhadap Kinerja Pegawai melalui Kepuasan Kerja. SEM-PLS.

Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693–713.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian bisnis (Cetakan ke-4). Alfabeta.