Analysis and Validation of the Development of Science Learning Materials Using a Guided Inquiry Model Combined with Carousel Feedback on the Topic of Light Properties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v2i4.228Keywords:
Validation, IPAS Learning Materials, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This study aimed to produce valid learning materials on the topic of light properties using the Plomp development model, which consists of five stages: Preliminary Investigation, Design, Realization, Testing, Evaluation, Revision, and Implementation. The model was modified to suit the specific needs of the study. The modification excluded the implementation phase after completing the test, evaluation, and revision stages. The developed learning materials included a Teaching Module based on guided inquiry combined with carousel feedback, Student Worksheets (LKPD), and a Critical Thinking Skills Test. The study focused solely on the validation process, encompassing construct and content validation of the developed materials. The validation was conducted by experts in science education, instructional design, and evaluation measurement. The validation process aimed to ensure that the learning materials met the criteria of validity, relevance, and feasibility for use. Data from the validation process were analyzed descriptively to determine the level of validity of the materials. Based on the validation results, the developed learning materials were declared valid and suitable for classroom use. The final product of this study was a set of learning materials designed not only to support students' understanding of light properties but also to enhance critical thinking skills through the guided inquiry approach and structured feedback. These materials were expected to contribute to improving the quality of science education in schools, particularly in the application of innovative, 21st-century skill-based teaching methods.
Downloads
References
Aminah, N. Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Performance Assessment Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Logika Hal 80-84 Vol X Tahun VII Edisi Maret 2014 ISSN 216 84995.
Arends, R. I. (2014). Learning to teach (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to use grading to improve learning. ASCD.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 34(3), 158-181.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2019). Pedagogical content knowledge: Its role in curriculum-based professional learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 349–367.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Muslimin. 2024. Analisis Persepsi Guru terhadap Game Edukasi Kahoot dan WordWall pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS di Sekolah Dasar. Maccayya Journal: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2(1). 52-62
Muslimin, Abdul Halik, Sitti Masita. 2024. Penggunaan Media Permainan Ular Tangga Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah Manusia Kelas V UPTD SD Negeri 64 Parepare. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar. 9(2), 3290-3303
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 7-39). SLO.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483365633.n1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















