Mitigasi Risiko Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Produksi Krimer Menggunakan House of Risk

Muhammad Farhan Hanafi; Andarmadi Jati Abdhi Wasesa

doi:10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1784

Authors

Muhammad Farhan Hanafi Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
Andarmadi Jati Abdhi Wasesa Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1784

Keywords:

Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja, House Of Risk, Industri Pangan, Mitigasi Risiko, Debu Mudah Terbakar

Abstract

Proses produksi krimer bubuk memiliki karakteristik bahaya yang kompleks karena melibatkan bahan berbentuk serbuk halus, mesin bertekanan, temperatur tinggi, bahan kimia pembersih, perpindahan material, dan aktivitas manual berulang. Kondisi tersebut menuntut pemetaan risiko yang tidak hanya menilai kejadian kecelakaan, tetapi juga memprioritaskan penyebab yang mampu memicu beberapa kejadian sekaligus. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kejadian dan agen risiko keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja, menentukan agen risiko prioritas, serta menyusun urutan strategi mitigasi pada proses produksi PT. XYZ. Penelitian menggunakan studi kasus deskriptif dengan data kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan kuesioner terhadap 25 responden yang dipilih secara purposif dari area penerimaan bahan, pencampuran, pengeringan semprot, produksi, pengemasan, laboratorium pengendalian mutu, dan fungsi keselamatan kerja. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan House of Risk dua fase. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi 16 kejadian risiko dan 16 agen risiko. Agen dengan Aggregate Risk Potential tertinggi adalah paparan debu halus bahan baku dengan nilai 470, diikuti sumber percikan dari gumpalan krimer hangus dengan nilai 369. Sepuluh agen prioritas menyumbang 87,88% dari total potensi risiko agregat. Pada fase mitigasi, prosedur Clean as You Go memperoleh nilai Effectiveness to Difficulty tertinggi sebesar 3.033, disusul penggunaan alat pelindung diri lengkap sebesar 1.896 dan pelatihan pengangkatan manual sebesar 1.611. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pengendalian segera berbasis kebersihan area dan kepatuhan pekerja perlu dipadukan dengan investasi rekayasa berupa pengendalian debu dan proteksi kebakaran. Pendekatan bertahap tersebut memberikan dasar operasional bagi perusahaan untuk mengalokasikan sumber daya keselamatan secara lebih terarah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abryandoko, E. W. & Mushthofa, M. 2020. Strategi mitigasi risiko supply chain dengan metode House of Risk. Rekayasa Sipil, 14(1).

Bu, Y., Addo, A., Amyotte, P. & Yuan, C. 2023. Classification of dispersibility for combustible dust based on Hausner ratio. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 81: 104925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104925.

Castells, B., Amez, I., Leon, D. & Garcia-Torrent, J. 2023. Coloured powder potential dust explosions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 83: 105014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105014.

Djunaidi, Z., Wirawan, M., Susilowati, I. H., Khaliwa, A. M. & Kanigara, S. A. 2024. Safety climate transformation in oil and gas company ownership transition: Study case from multinational to national company. Safety and Health at Work, 15(3): 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2024.04.009.

Fauliyadi, Nalhadi, A., Cahyadi, D., Sucipto, E. H. & Supriyadi. 2021. Perencanaan sistem perawatan mesin dust collector PECS ID Fan menggunakan metode Reliability Centered Maintenance. JENIUS: Jurnal Terapan Teknik Industri, 2(1): 30-40. https://doi.org/10.37373/jenius.v2i1.102.

Gonyora, M. & Ventura-Medina, E. 2024. Investigating the relationship between human and organisational factors, maintenance, and accidents: The case of chemical process industry in South Africa. Safety Science, 176: 106530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106530.

Hertanto, A., Erwandi, D., Widanarko, B. & Tejamaya, M. 2023. Relationship between safety climate and safety behavior in Company X in Indonesia. Safety, 9(4): 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040089.

Irawan, T., Hidayat, A. N. & Widya, A. R. 2025. Analisis risiko K3 menggunakan metode HIRADC area produksi di PT. Adiku Bekasi, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, 5(2): 1229-1238. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.1465.

Iwuozor, K. O., Ojeyemi, T., Emenike, E. C., Umeh, C. T., Egbemhenghe, A., Ayoku, B. D., Ogunsanya, T. I., Ogunniyi, S., Ighalo, J. O. & Adeniyi, A. G. 2024. Management of sugar dust in the sugar industry. Heliyon, 10(1): e23158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23158.

Kukfisz, B. & Piec, R. 2021. The fire and explosion hazard of coloured powders used during the Holi Festival. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21): 11090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111090.

Kurniawan, S., Marzuky, D., Ryanto, R. & Agustine, V. 2021. Risk and supply chain mitigation analysis using House of Risk method and Analytical Network Process: A case study on palm oil company. The Winners, 22(2): 123-136. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v22i2.7056.

Musavi, F., Hekmatshoar, R., Fallahi, M., Moradi, A. & Yazdani-Aval, M. 2024. Identifying and preventing human error in the sugar production process: A multi-stage approach using HTA, HEC and PHEA techniques. Heliyon, 10(9): e29687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29687.

Palengka, G. J., Vikaliana, R. & Utami, P. 2024. Supply chain risk mitigation using the House of Risk approach: Evidence in an Indonesian catering company. KnE Social Sciences, 9(16): 476-498. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i16.16265.

Prasetyo, B., Retnani, W. E. Y. & Ifadah, N. L. M. 2022. Analisis strategi mitigasi risiko supply chain management menggunakan House of Risk. Jurnal Tekno Kompak, 16(2): 72-84. https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v16i2.1878.

Pujawan, I. N. & Geraldin, L. H. 2009. House of Risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6): 953-967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801.

Qiu, Z., Liu, Q., Li, X. & Zhang, Y. 2024. Why do workers generate biased risk perceptions? An analysis of anchoring effects and influential factors in workers assessment of unsafe behavior. Safety and Health at Work, 15(3): 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2024.05.004.

Rahimi, Z., Ghorbani-Shahna, F. & Bahrami, A. 2021. Design, implementation, and evaluation of industrial ventilation systems and filtration for silica dust emissions from a mineral processing company. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 25(4): 192-197. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_55_19.

Ramadhan, F. A., Mansur, A., Setiawan, N. & Salleh, M. R. 2025. An analytical risk mitigation framework for steel fabrication supply chains using fuzzy inference and House of Risk. Supply Chain Analytics, 10: 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100122.

Rohimat, I. 2022. Analisa penerapan sistem manajemen keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja di perusahaan industri makanan: Kasus di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Tiarsie, 19(2).

Sudiarno, A., Majid, M. B., Rizkiyah, E., Fikri, M. N. & Ramli, A. 2025. HORshe: A novel-systematic method for safety risk assessment using SHELL and hierarchy of control. MethodsX, 15: 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103669.

Tian, C., Yang, Z. & Zhang, L. 2025. A review of grain dust explosions: Prevention and control. Results in Engineering, 26: 105483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105483.

Zhang, J., Wang, J., Gao, J. & Zhang, W. 2024. Exhaust hood performance and its improvement technologies in industrial buildings: A literature review. Building Simulation, 17: 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1040-2.

Zhong, Y., Li, X., Yang, Z., Liu, X. & Yao, E. 2024. A model for minimum ignition energy prediction of sugar dust clouds based on interactive orthogonal experiments and machine learning. Fire Safety Journal, 144: 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104111.