Effect of Integral Waterproofing on Strength and Durability of Foamed Concrete

Authors

  • Jack Widjajakusuma Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Ricky Tjahjono Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Muhammad Agil Faisal Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Mainawa Bidangan Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1705

Keywords:

Foamed Concrete, Integral Waterproofing, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, Compressive Strength

Abstract

Foamed concrete is widely used in lightweight construction, but its porous structure leads to high water absorption and moisture damage, thereby limiting durability. This study examines how an integral waterproofing admixture affects density, compressive strength, and internal quality of foamed concrete produced by the pre-formed foam method. Five mixes were tested: two references with polycarboxylate superplasticizer at two foam levels (2F3-S, 2F5-S) and three with the admixture at 5, 7.5, and 10 kg/m³ (2F3A5, 2F3A7.5, 2F3A10). Density, compressive strength (at 1, 3, 7, and 28 days), and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) were measured. Waterproofed mixes showed higher 28-day density (1911–2020 kg/m³) and strength (34.4–43.0 MPa) than references (1665 kg/m³, 21.9 MPa). Strength rose with admixture dosage. Early-age strengths were similar, so hydration was not hindered. Higher density suggests admixture–foam interaction. At 28 days, UPV was higher in waterproofed mixes (4.3–4.5 km/s vs. 2.8–3.3 km/s) and closely correlated with density (R² = 0.99), indicating better cohesion and less pore connectivity. The high-foam reference mix had only 8.5 MPa at 1463 kg/m³, showing the strength loss from more foam. Thus, integral waterproofing improves foamed concrete’s quality and is effective for moisture-exposed elements like façade panels, roofs, and lightweight components, offering an alternative to surface waterproofing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheng, B., Gu, X., Gao, Y., Ma, P., & Kang, S. (2022). ”Thermal and Waterproof Properties of Foamed Concrete with Nano SiO₂ Aerogel and Organosilicon Waterproofing Agent.” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, Article ID 3054214. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3054214

Gao, J., Geng, Y., Li, S., Chen, X., Shi, D., Zhou, P., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Z. (2021). ”Effect of silane emulsion on waterproofing and anti-icing performance of foamed concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 301, 124082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124082

Gong, J., & Li, K. (2020). ”Minimizing Drying Shrinkage and Enhancing Impermeability of Foam Concrete Modified with Epoxy Resin.” Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8897687

Lee, Y. L., Oh, C. H., Lim, M. H., & Lee, F. W. (2018). ”Engineering Properties of Foamed Concrete Containing Water Repellent.” E3S Web of Conferences, 65, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186502005

Lermen, R. T., Favaretto, P., Silva, R. de A., Hidalgo, G. E. N., Tubino, R. M. C., & Tiecher, F. (2019). ”Effect of additives, cement type, and foam amount on the properties of foamed concrete developed with civil construction waste.” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9152998

Lv, X. S., Cao, W. X., Yio, M., Ji, W. Y., Lu, J. X., She, W., & Poon, C. S. (2024). ”High-performance lightweight foam concrete enabled by compositing ultra-stable hydrophobic aqueous foam.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 152, 105675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105675

Mao, J., Xu, Y., Kang, X., Tong, S., Chu, H., & Jiang, L. (2025). ”The Production and Durability of Superhydrophobic Foamed Concrete.” Materials, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030663

Shi, D., Geng, Y., Li, S., Gao, J., Hou, D., Jin, Z., & Liu, A. (2022). ”Efficacy and mechanism of graphene oxide modified silane emulsions on waterproof performance of foamed concrete.” Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00908

Sun, L., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Wang, R., & Yao, L. (2023). ”Designing a superhydrophobic quality and strengthening mechanism for foam concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 365, 130073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130073

Wu, F., Niu, Q., Chen, X., & Guo, Y. (2025). ”Resource utilization of antimony tailings: Preparation of lightweight, waterproof, and environmental friendly foamed concrete.” Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 43, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2025.101907

Ying, L., Yu, P., Wang, F., & Jiang, P. (2025). ”Evaluation of Integral and Surface Hydrophobic Modification on Permeation Resistance of Foam Concrete.” Coatings, 15(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15070854

Zhou, G., & Leung Su, R. K. (2024). ”A review on serviceability of foam concrete.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials, 177(6), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.24.00004

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Widjajakusuma, J., Tjahjono, R., Faisal, M. A., & Bidangan, M. (2026). Effect of Integral Waterproofing on Strength and Durability of Foamed Concrete . Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 4(3), 4091–4102. https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1705