The Pedagogy Of The Prophets: A Systematic Literature Review Of Symbolic Actions, Vivid Imagery, And Public Oratory In Isaiah, Jeremiah, And Hosea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1670Keywords:
prophetic pedagogy, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Hosea, symbolic action, metaphor, public oratory, systematic literature review, religious education, covenant formationAbstract
This article synthesizes scholarship on the pedagogy of the Hebrew prophets, asking how Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Hosea used symbolic actions, vivid imagery, and public oratory as instruments of teaching. Prophetic literature has long been read through historical, theological, literary, and rhetorical lenses, yet its pedagogical character has rarely been treated as a single, integrated problem. Working from a PRISMA 2020-informed systematic literature review and a qualitative thematic synthesis, the study draws together research on prophetic sign-acts, metaphor, public address, embodied knowledge, covenant rhetoric, and religious formation. What emerges is a portrait of prophetic pedagogy as embodied, imaginative, public, affective, and transformative. Isaiah formed perception around holiness, justice, judgment, and hope through visual signs and poetic imagery. Jeremiah used enacted signs and temple oratory to puncture false security and press the community toward covenant accountability. Hosea turned family symbolism, marriage metaphor, and the language of healing into a dramatization of covenant infidelity and divine restoration. From these patterns the article proposes an integrated model in which divine message, prophetic medium, audience engagement, and covenantal learning outcome are inseparable. By reframing prophetic ministry as transformative pedagogy, the study speaks to biblical studies, theology, and faith-based education alike, offering a resource for contemporary religious educators and the institutions they serve.
Downloads
References
Aberbach, D. (2020). Moral dilemmas and the environment: The Hebrew Bible and the literature of industry. Journal of the Council for Research on Religion, 2(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v2i1.37
Avioz, M. (2006). A rhetorical analysis of Jeremiah 7:1-15. Tyndale Bulletin, 57(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.29214
Brueggemann, W. (2001). The prophetic imagination (2nd ed.). Fortress Press.
France, R. T. (1975). Old Testament prophecy and the future of Israel: A study of the teaching of Jesus. Tyndale Bulletin, 26(1), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.30633
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Fretheim, T. E. (2002). Jeremiah. Smyth & Helwys.
Fohrer, G. (1953). Die symbolischen Handlungen der Propheten. ZAW Beihefte.
Friebel, K. G. (1999). Jeremiah's and Ezekiel's sign-acts: Rhetorical nonverbal communication. Sheffield Academic Press.
Friebel, K. G. (2012). Sign acts. In M. J. Boda & J. G. McConville (Eds.), Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets (pp. 707-713). IVP Academic.
Haddox, S. E. (2016). Masculinity studies of the Hebrew Bible: The first two decades. Currents in Biblical Research, 14(2), 176-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993x15575496
Heschel, A. J. (1962). The prophets. Harper & Row.
Instone-Brewer, D. (1996). Three weddings and a divorce: God's covenant with Israel, Judah and the Church. Tyndale Bulletin, 47(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.30380
Kelle, B. E. (2005). Hosea 2: Metaphor and rhetoric in historical perspective. Society of Biblical Literature.
Keller, J. (2020). Ambiguities of prophecy: Old Testament rhetoric in the American founding era. Politics and Religion, 13(3), 575-603. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048320000024
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















