House of Risk untuk Mitigasi Risiko Rantai Pasok Kelapa di Minahasa Selatan

Willy Fratama Purba; Ni Wayan Christy Rilliane Nucivera Adnyana

doi:10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1357

Authors

Willy Fratama Purba Universitas Sam Ratulangi
Ni Wayan Christy Rilliane Nucivera Adnyana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i3.1357

Keywords:

House of Risk, SCOR, rantai pasok kelapa, mitigasi risiko, Minahasa Selatan

Abstract

Rantai pasok kelapa berbasis petani kecil di Minahasa Selatan menghadapi ketidakpastian mutu, pasokan, harga, dan cuaca yang dapat menurunkan kinerja aliran bahan baku dari petani, pengepul, hingga pabrik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menyusun prioritas mitigasi risiko secara proaktif melalui integrasi kerangka Supply Chain Operations Reference dan model House of Risk. Data primer dikumpulkan melalui pemetaan lapangan, wawancara pakar, diskusi kelompok terarah, serta survei praktisi, kemudian dianalisis dengan penilaian severity, occurrence, korelasi risk event-risk agent, Aggregate Risk Potential, dan rasio efektivitas terhadap kesulitan implementasi. Hasil identifikasi menunjukkan 34 kejadian risiko pada proses Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, dan Enable serta 24 sumber risiko. Pada House of Risk fase pertama, sumber risiko dominan berkaitan dengan keterlambatan pembalikan atau rotasi hamparan dan musim hujan saat pengeringan, disusul rantai pasok panjang, produktivitas tanaman tua, volatilitas harga hulu, pertumbuhan jamur, modal kerja terbatas, area pengeringan terbuka, ketebalan hamparan berlebih, kelembagaan lemah, serta kapasitas dokumentasi dan traceability yang rendah. House of Risk fase kedua menghasilkan 12 tindakan proaktif, dengan prioritas utama berupa standardisasi SOP rotasi hamparan, standardisasi ketebalan dan geometri hamparan, serta skema insentif-penalti berbasis mutu. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan ini layak, terukur, auditable, dan dapat direplikasi untuk memperkuat mutu kopra, kontinuitas pasokan, dan daya saing komoditas agro serupa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldrighetti, R., Battini, D., Ivanov, D., & Zennaro, I. (2021). A framework for evaluating supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(19), 5750-5771.

Araz, O. M., Choi, T., Olson, D., & Salman, F. (2020). Data analytics for operational risk management. Annals of Operations Research, 293, 1-26.

Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148.

Dania, W. A. P., Ardiasti, A. O., & Rohmah, W. G. (2025). Enhancing retailer efficiency of agro-industrial products: A DEA approach based on the SCOR perspective. Agrointek, 19(4), 784-793.

Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020). Reconfigurable supply chain: The X-network. International Journal of Production Research, 58(13), 4138-4163.

Ekawati, I., Marimin, & Udin, F. (2019). Penentuan lokasi agroindustri kopra di Kepulauan Sangihe. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 29(2), 139-149.

Fauziah, S. A., Sari, W. P., & Puspitasari, D. (2024). Pengukuran kinerja rantai pasok beras menggunakan SCOR 12.0. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 8(2).

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. (2023). Innovations and trends in agro-industry supply chains. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7.

Golan, M. S., Jernegan, L. H., & Linkov, I. (2020). Trends and applications of resilience analytics in food supply chains. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 193.

Hartanto, N., & Rahmawati, D. (2022). Evaluasi kinerja supply chain menggunakan metode analisis berbasis SCOR. Ekomabis, 3(2), 120-130.

Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2023). Advances in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Research, 61(5), 1584-1603.

Ivanov, D. (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136, 101922.

Ivanov, D. (2021). Supply chain viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 59(12), 3535-3552.

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience-viability framework. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915.

Magdalena, R., Wardhani, A. K., & Nugroho, S. S. (2019). Analisis risiko supply chain dengan model House of Risk. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 14(2), 55-62.

Maulina, D. I., Hanim, D., Manzilati, A., & Rahayu, S. M. (2021). Kinerja rantai pasok kelapa dengan pendekatan SCOR di Banyuwangi. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, 14(3), 346-362.

Özkanlısoy, Ö., & Letmathe, P. (2023). Measuring supply chain performance as SCOR v13.0: A validated scale. Inventions, 8(3).

Paramudita, U. S., & Suryaningrat, I. B. (2022). Analisis risiko rantai pasok kopi menggunakan House of Risk. Agrointek: Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 16(1), 54-64.

Putri, F. P., Bantacut, T., & Marimin. (2020). Peningkatan kinerja dan mitigasi risiko rantai pasok melalui analisis kinerja dan risiko. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 30(2), 213-224.

Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Wamba, S. F. (2020). Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: Mapping a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2937-2956.

Rahmawati, I. N., & Choiron, M. (2022). House of Risk untuk mitigasi risiko pasokan bahan baku pada industri pangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 21(2).

Rajesh, R. (2020). A systematic review of supply chain risk management: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283.

Saleheen, F., & Habib, M. (2023). Embedding attributes toward supply chain performance measurement. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 6.

Sari, E. Y., Guritno, A. D., & Sukartiko, A. C. (2021). Risk assessment on the supply chain of geographical-indication granulated coconut sugar in Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(1), 86-92.

Sarkar, S., & Chan, C. (2021). Improving supply chain resilience through mitigation and recovery. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149.

Sembiring, M. T., Hidayat, S., & Yulianti, L. (2021). Pemodelan rantai pasok fleksibel untuk pengambilan keputusan. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 31(1), 45-56.

Silvia, E., Udin, F., Bantacut, T., & Marimin. (2024). Kinerja rantai pasok PT X dalam peningkatan keberlanjutan dan responsivitas agroindustri kelapa sawit. Agrointek, 18(2), 131-142.

Tutuhatunewa, A., Rindengan, A., & Susanto, T. (2023). Pengukuran kinerja rantai pasok dengan integrasi SCOR dan AHP: Studi kasus galangan kapal. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 25(2).

van Engelenhoven, T., Balkenende, R., & Kramer, E. (2023). Systematic analysis of SCOR in the circular economy context. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3, 1129-1154.

Wahyudi, A., Abdillah, B., & Zulkarnain, M. (2025a). Building sustainable and resilient coconut supply chains in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 457.

Wahyudi, A., Abdillah, B., & Zulkarnain, M. (2025b). Building sustainable and resilient coconut supply chains in remote areas: A study from Riau Province, Indonesia. Sustainable Futures, 9.

Zainol, F. A., Arumugam, N., Daud, W. N. W., Suhaimi, N. A. M., Ishola, B. D., Ishak, A. Z., & Afthanorhan, A. (2023). Coconut value chain analysis: A systematic review. Agriculture, 13(7), 1379.