Do Your Own Research (DYOR) And Not Financial Advice (NFA) As A Liability-Limiting Doctrine In Indonesian Capital Market Law

Authors

  • Rifqon Khairazi Universitas Cenderawasih
  • I Putu Endra Wijaya Negara Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Berd Elkiopas Pelupessy Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.1197

Keywords:

Do Your Own Research (DYOR), Not Financial Advice (NFA), Capital Market Law, Investment Advice, Legal Liability

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of capital markets has transformed the production and dissemination of investment information, enabling individual investors to share analyses and opinions through social media and online platforms. This development has increased the use of disclaimers such as Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and Not Financial Advice (NFA), which are frequently employed to indicate that published content does not constitute professional investment advice. Despite their widespread adoption, the legal status and liability-limiting function of these disclaimers remain largely unexplored within Indonesian capital market law. This study examines whether DYOR and NFA may operate as normative instruments that limit legal responsibility arising from publicly disseminated investment analyses. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the research analyzes Indonesian capital market regulations alongside relevant doctrines of liability, reliance, and financial communication. The study finds that DYOR and NFA should not be understood merely as informal expressions but as contextual disclaimers that may clarify the absence of advisory relationships and reduce reasonable reliance by audiences. However, their effectiveness depends on the substance of the communication rather than the disclaimer itself. Where content contains personalized recommendations, inducement of reliance, misleading statements, or undisclosed conflicts of interest, disclaimers cannot negate regulatory obligations or legal liability. The study proposes doctrinal criteria for distinguishing protected investment opinions from actionable investment advice and argues that Indonesian regulators should adopt a substance-based approach that balances investor protection with freedom of expression in digital investment discourse.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bird, R., Gallagher, D. R., Khan, A., & Yeung, D. (2023). Do emotions influence investor behaviour? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4463464

Cookson, J. A., Engelberg, J. E., & Mullins, W. (2023). Echo chambers. The Review of Financial Studies, 36, 450–500.

Cookson, J. A., Lu, R., Mullins, W., & Niessner, M. (2024). The social signal. Journal of Financial Economics, 158, 103870.

Dai, X., Zhang, J., & Chang, V. (2025). Noise traders in an agent-based artificial stock market. Annals of Operations Research, 352(3), 715–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05528-7

Edwards, B. (2017). Conflicts & capital allocation. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2801672

Farrell, M., Green, T. C., Jame, R., & Markov, S. (2022). The democratization of investment research and the informativeness of retail investor trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 616–641.

Halbhuber, F. (2023). Non-disclosure and the Misrepresentation Act 1967: A new framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4508866

Jang, J., & Jun, S. (2025). Social media influencers and stock market. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5116186

Karampatsas, N., Malekpour, S., Mason, A., & Mavis, C. P. (2023). Twitter investor sentiment and corporate earnings announcements. European Financial Management, 29(3), 953–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12384

Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets.

Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority.

Lazaro, C. (2018). The regulation of digital investment advice. PIABA 27th Annual Meeting Materials. PIABA.

Leung, F. F., Gu, F. F., Li, Y., Zhang, J. Z., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Influencer marketing effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 86(6), 93–115.

Mackenzie, S. (2022). Criminology towards the metaverse: Cryptocurrency scams, grey economy and the technosocial. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(6), 1537–1552. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab118

Nguyen, D. K., Sermpinis, G., & Stasinakis, C. (2023). Big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning: A transformative symbiosis in favour of financial technology. European Financial Management, 29(2), 517–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12365

Pedersen, L. H. (2022). Game on: Social networks and markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(3), 1097–1119.

Shapiro, A. H., Sudhof, M., & Wilson, D. J. (2022). Measuring news sentiment. Journal of Econometrics, 228(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.053

Xiong, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Whoever has will be given more: Information sharing in financial markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3632315

Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Liu, S., & Wang, J. (2023). How does an online influencer manipulate the stock market? SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4466065

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Khairazi, R., Negara, I. P. E. W., & Pelupessy, B. E. (2026). Do Your Own Research (DYOR) And Not Financial Advice (NFA) As A Liability-Limiting Doctrine In Indonesian Capital Market Law. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 4(2), 5571–5581. https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.1197