Politeness Strategy and Social Power in Animal Farm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.1041Keywords:
Animal Farm, Discourse Analysis, Politeness Strategies, Pragmatics, Social PowerAbstract
Politeness strategies as a reflection of social power: A study of Animal Farm by George Orwell a pivotal difference with regard to prior studies is that this paper does not concern itself primarily with ideological and political questions but rather examines the function of linguistic politeness as a medium for asserting power. This research used a descriptive qualitative method to analyze data from the dialogues, utterances, and commands of characters through Brown and Levinson’s theory of politeness as well as Bourdieu’s concepts of symbolic power. The results found four politeness strategies which are bald-on-record, positive politeness, negative politeness and off record strategy. The analysis also illustrates how language is both a means of and an end to conserving symbolic, political, informational, and institutional authority. Communicative practices also evolve with changing relations of power across the narrative. They begin as a source of solidarity and trust, before becoming tools for manipulation and rationalising inequalities. As authority becomes total, indirect statements are incrementally replaced by explicit and blunt expressions. Hence, in Animal Farm polite language plays a role not only to work on the interpersonal or the social level but also as rhetoric for persuasion and manipulation of power over others by certain characters within an unequally organized society.
Downloads
References
AL-dihaymawee, D. T. M. (2025). The Political Discourse in “Animal Farm” by George Orwell: A Critical Discourse Study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Research, 4(1), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMCR.2025.5.1.37-39
Azizan, M., Nasir, N. S. M., & Osman, N. (2025). A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis: Constructions of Identity and Power in Animal Farm by George Orwell. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(24), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0060
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and Symbolic Power. In Polity Press.
Cummings, C. (2025). Understanding power, culture and institutional change: A revised approach to political settlements analysis. New Political Economy, 29(6), 1021–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2024.2389515
Creswell, J. w. (2015). Educational Research - Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research - Fifth Edition. In Pearson Education, Inc (fifth edit).
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act (first). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Farzana Khan, Maryam Aadil, & Aurangzaib Akbar. (2022). Pragmatic Approach: A Study of Politeness Strategies in Pakistani Morning Shows. Sjesr, 5(3), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol5-iss3-2022(9-21)
Fathi, S. (2024). Revisiting Brown and Levinson’s Theory of Politeness. European Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 3(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2024.3.5.137
Febriyani, N. P. W., Beratha, N. L. S., & Sukarini, N. W. (2023). Positive politeness strategies used in visitors’ reviews of Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Park on TripAdvisor. Stilistika: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature, 2(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.24843/STIL.2023.v02.i02.p08
Haugaard, M. (2023). Kleptocracy, authoritarianism and democracy as ideal types of political power. Journal of Political Power, 16(3), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2023.2194712
Irsyadi, A. N., & Dzulqarnain, M. I. (2023). Symbolic power in interlevel interactive learning culture at the English Institute. Sanskara Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.58812/sish.v1i01.306
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
Levinson, B. (1987). Politenesssome-Universals-in-Language-Usage.
McCarthy, F. (2024). (Mis)recognising the symbolic violence of academically selective education in England: A critical application of Bourdieusian analysis to pupils’ lived experiences. Critical Studies in Education, 65(5), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2024.2409672
Miles, Matthew B Huberman. A. Michael Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (Third). Sage Publications.
Nuramdani, H., Wahyuni, S., & Sutopo, D. (2023). The use of politeness strategies in online teacher–students' virtual classroom interaction. English Education Journal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v13i2.73834
Seli, S., Arma, L. R., & Syafitri, D. (2021). Language Choice and Attitude among Native Lubuklinggau Community. EDULIA: English Education, Linguistic and Art Journal, 1(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.31539/edulia.v1i2.2348
Sharhan, K., Shukur, N., & Younus, M. (2022). Dominant Ideology in Orwell’s Novel Animal Farm: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Extracts. 12, 27–42.
Sudar, Sukarni, S., Setiyono, J., Widoyoko, S. E. P., & Irianto, S. (2025). Language politeness in EFL student-lecturer interactions through technology-assisted communication. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v15i1.69949
Sugiyono. (2021). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF, R&D (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.
Suparno, D., Fitriana, I., Nadra, N., Gunawan, F., & Boulahnane, S. (2023). Redefining politeness: Power and status in the digital age. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2218195. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2218195
Suryana, Y., Zahra, S. D. A., & Asikin, N. A. (2024). Politeness Strategy Analysis Used By Tenggo Wicaksono in His Youtube Channel. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 6(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v6i2.11103
Talbot, D. (2023). Knowledge, knowers, and power: Understanding the ‘power’ of powerful knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(5), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2256009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















