The Flavor of Taboo: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Sex-Food Metaphors in Indonesian and American Discourse

Sastika Seli; Ayu Oktaviani; Agus Triyogo

doi:10.69693/ijim.v4i2.1030

Authors

Sastika Seli PGRI Silampari University
Ayu Oktaviani PGRI Silampari University
Agus Triyogo PGRI Silampari University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.1030

Keywords:

Food-Talk, Sex-Food Metaphor, Discourse Analysis, Taboo Language, Sociolinguistics

Abstract

This research aims to examine how sensory perception, especially visual and olfactory features, contribute to the formation of metaphors, and to explain the sociolinguistic functions of these metaphors in humor, intimacy building, and taboos. This research is a qualitative descriptive research using the Conceptual Metaphor theory by Lakoff and Johnson. Data are sourced from the analysis of the American movie series Sausage Party: Foodtopia to analyze discourse in American English and also casual conversations of informants in the city of Lubuklinggau when using the Lubuklinggau regional language. The results show that the characteristics of food and human sexuality are shaped by cultural norms and social interactions. Speakers of the Lubuklinggau dialect use euphemisms and indirect expressions to discuss taboo topics politely, while in the American animated series, the expression of sexual symbols is explicit and exaggerate. These metaphors not only function as humor but also as a tool to build intimacy, assess gender identity, and demonstrate social power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attardo, S. (2024). Linguistic theory of humor (Second). De Gruyter Mouton.

Boellstorff, T. (2004). Gay language and Indonesia : Registering belonging. Journal of Linguistic Antrhropology, 14(2), 248–268. http://www.ucpress.edu/journals/rights.htm.

Crouse, M., Nakos, C., Abdelaziz, I., & Forbus, K. (2021). Neural Analogical Matching.

Du Plessis, R., & Maree, M. (2009). ngendered representations : 30(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v30i2.55

Gerber, S. (2022). You are what you eat . . . But do you eat what you are ? The. 1–20.

Graziani, A. R., Guidetti, M., & Cavazza, N. (2021). Food for boys and food for girls : Do preschool children hold gender stereotypes about food ? Sex Roles, 84, 491–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01182-6

Huang, J. (2021). Perception metaphors in cognition , language , and communication. The Sensesand Society, 16(3), 356–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2020.1763040

Hunt, M., Stockall, L., Cotter, C., & Pearson, H. (2022). Swear ( ING ) ain ’ t play ( ING ): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12588

Javier, F., & Flores, A. (2023). Resumen: Este trabajo analiza la presencia del astracán, lo grotesco y el esperpento en el cine de Pedro Almodóvar, no solo en los filmes calificados como comedias —. 26, 187–209.

Kamizi, E. (2023). Visual food metaphor: a mechanism. Actual Problems of Linguistics and Literary Studies. https://philology.tsu.ru/sites/default/files/Aktualnye_problemy_lingvistiki_i_literaturovedenia_24.pdf

Khalid, S., The, A., & Authorization, H. A. L. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research Sirwan Khalid Ahmed To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-04699461. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486. https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/F01/lakoff.johnson80.pdf

Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech : The theory of the strategic speaker rationales for indirect speech : The theory of the strategic speaker. 117(3), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019688

Martín, P. M. (2023). Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación La expresión del tabú : patrones sociolingüísticos y geolectales. 2016, 79–93.

Mazzuca, C., & Majid, A. (2023). The semantic representation of food is shaped by cultural experience. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.4

Rodríguez, A., Cortázar, G. De, González, I., Carmuca, C., & Bueno, G. (2024). What is the patriarchy doing in our bed ? Violent sexual ‑ affective experiences among youth. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00956-x

Seli, S., & Alfitri, B. (2017). American humor used in an american comedy movies the boss. 1(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v1i1.31

Stahl, B. N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal Developmental of Education, 44, 26–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1320570.pdf

Stano, S. (2016). Introduction : Semiotics of food. Marrone 2014, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0095

Stano, S. (2026). Beyond nutrition : Meaning, narratives, myths. In S. Stano & A. Bentley (Eds.), Food for Thought (1st ed., Issue June, pp. 210–228). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81115-0

Thula, U., Koops, T. U., & Frith, H. (2021). ’ I don ’ t live in my body somehow ': metaphorical talk in women ’ s accounts of vaginismus and dyspareunia ‘ I don ’ t live in my body somehow ’: metaphorical talk in women ’ s accounts of vaginismus and. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.1992015

Waltenburg, T. (2021). Food choices: Negotiating identities and feeling at home in the social landscape of sharing a meal. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9059081/file/9060233.pdf

Zibin, A., & Solopova, O. A. (2024). Metaphors across languages , cultures and discourses : A research agenda Метафора в языке , культуре и дискурсе : исследовательская повестка дня. 28(1), 7–32.